Baker who refused to make a cake for a gay couple will get a hearing from the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court has set up a battle between the rights of LGBTQ Americans and proponents of "religious freedom."
 By 
Colin Daileda
 on 
Baker who refused to make a cake for a gay couple will get a hearing from the Supreme Court
Charlie Craig, left, and his husband Dave Mullins prepare to play cards while hanging out together after work at their home in Westminster, Colorado. Credit: Brennan Linsley/AP/REX/Shutterstock

The Supreme Court has set up a battle between the rights of LGBTQ Americans and proponents of "religious freedom."

On Monday, the court agreed to hear an October appeal by the owner of a Colorado cake shop who refused to bake a wedding cake for a gay couple in 2012.

The owner, Jack Phillips, has said his religion prohibits him from providing cakes for same-sex weddings, and he won't make baked goods for Halloween celebrations or anything that's "adult-themed," either. He believes baking a cake for a same-sex wedding implies that he condones same-sex marriage, a message he doesn't want to send.

The couple, Charlie Craig and David Mullins, filed a complaint after Phillips denied them service in 2012. They'd planned to marry in Massachusetts, since same-sex marriage wasn't legal nationwide at the time, and hold a reception in Colorado. The couple wanted a cake for the reception, but Phillips told them that fulfilling their request violated his religious beliefs and that other cake shops would be able to help.

In 2015, the Colorado Court of Appeals determined that making a cake for Craig and Mullins didn't mean Phillips condoned same-sex marriage. The ruling also stated that the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act "prohibits places of public accommodations from basing their refusal to serve customers on their sexual orientation..."

In a Supreme Court briefing filed by Phillips's lawyer, the lawyer argued that customers refused by Phillips could "easily" get a cake from another bakery.

The couple's lawyer likened this argument to refusing black customers food at a restaurant "in 1966" because they could find food elsewhere.

Mashable Image
Colin Daileda

Colin is Mashable's US & World Reporter. He previously interned at Foreign Policy magazine and The American Prospect. Colin is a graduate from Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism. When he's not at Mashable, you can most likely find him eating or playing some kind of sport.

Mashable Potato

Recommended For You
Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs 6-3. Tech stocks rally, but will prices drop?
President Trump Holds a poster showing tariff rates during the 'Make America Wealthy Again Event' at White House Rose Garden

Supreme Court denies case seeking copyrights for AI-generated art
The exterior of the US Supreme Court building.

Jimmy Kimmel responds to Pam Bondi's chaotic Epstein hearing
A man in a suit stands on a talk show stage. The caption at the bottom reads, "If they have nothing to hide, why are they hiding names?"

How to watch 'Marty Supreme': When is Timothée Chalamet’s Oscar-nominated film streaming?
Timothee Chalamet as Marty Mauser in "Marty Supreme"

CBS refused to broadcast this Stephen Colbert interview. Here's how to watch it anyway.
Stephen Colbert on "The Late Show with Stephen Colbert."

Trending on Mashable
NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for April 3, 2026
Connections game on a smartphone

NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for April 4, 2026
Connections game on a smartphone

Wordle today: Answer, hints for April 3, 2026
Wordle game on a smartphone

Wordle today: Answer, hints for April 4, 2026
Wordle game on a smartphone

Google launches Gemma 4, a new open-source model: How to try it
Google Gemma
The biggest stories of the day delivered to your inbox.
These newsletters may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. By clicking Subscribe, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Thanks for signing up. See you at your inbox!