X, formerly Twitter, introduces 'sensitivity settings' to revive ad sales

Advertisers can choose how much spam and gore their ads appear beside.
 By 
Elizabeth de Luna
 on 
Side profile of Elon Musk next to the "X" logo (white X on a black background).
Credit: Emin Sansar/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images

Elon Musk has made a big deal of X's free speech agenda. But it turns out — and who could have seen this coming — that approach to modern social media just doesn't make money.

Twitter was never profitable. But under Musk, the company known know as X has fallen even deeper into the red. In June, the company's ad sales were down 59% compared to the same time last year.

Now, X will test the effectiveness of a tool called "sensitivity settings" in wooing advertisers back to the platform.


You May Also Like

In a blog post, the company said the tool would use machine learning to ensure that a brand's ads show up next to content that meet its "unique sensitivity needs," which they also call a "sensitivity threshold." It's a lot of big words that mean the same thing: brands don't want their ads showing up next to content that isn't good for PR.

A screenshot of the tool details the three levels of sensitivity:

  • Relaxed sensitivity, which is not yet available, will "show ads alongside some sensitive content to maximize reach" but will exclude targeted hate speech and explicit sexual content

  • Standard sensitivity is for brands with "moderate sensitivity thresholds" and will not show ads alongside targeted hate speech, explicit sexual content, gratuitous gore, excessive profanity.

  • Conservative sensitivity is a "strict sensitivity threshold" that will not show ads next to "targeted hate speech, sexual content, gratuitous gore, excessive profanity, obscenity, spam, and drugs."

Screenshot of the sensitivity setting panel
A screenshot of the "sensitivity setting" panel as seen in X's blog post about the tool. Credit: X

The blog notes that "Standard" sensitivity is selected by default.

The blog also works overtime to assure advertisers that spend their money on X is a good idea. In addition to an endorsement from an SVP at Mondelez, the post offers up this wild claim: "over the past 9 months, X has delivered a decade’s worth of innovation focused on creating an engaging and healthy environment where everyone, including advertisers, can connect safely."

But if X is so safe, why is it struggling to retain advertisers? I guess X's ads team can tackle that quandary next.

Topics X/Twitter

Mashable Image
Elizabeth de Luna
Culture Reporter

Elizabeth is a digital culture reporter covering the internet's influence on self-expression, fashion, and fandom. Her work explores how technology shapes our identities, communities, and emotions. Before joining Mashable, Elizabeth spent six years in tech. Her reporting can be found in Rolling Stone, The Guardian, TIME, and Teen Vogue. Follow her on Instagram here.

Mashable Potato

Recommended For You
If dark scenes are too dark on your TV, play around with these settings
Illustration of hand pointing remote at TV to adjust brightness setting



How to turn a tablet into an e-reader: The best settings and accessories
A hand holding an iPad Mini with the Libby app open

This $20 smart scale is the easiest way to track your 2026 health wins
The Renpho smart scale against a pink and purple background.

Trending on Mashable
NYT Connections hints today: Clues, answers for April 3, 2026
Connections game on a smartphone

Wordle today: Answer, hints for April 3, 2026
Wordle game on a smartphone

What's new to streaming this week? (April 3, 2026)
A composite of images from film and TV streaming this week.


NYT Strands hints, answers for April 3, 2026
A game being played on a smartphone.
The biggest stories of the day delivered to your inbox.
These newsletters may contain advertising, deals, or affiliate links. By clicking Subscribe, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Thanks for signing up. See you at your inbox!